4.6 Article

Oriented growth of rubrene thin films on aligned pentacene buffer layer and its anisotropic thin-film transistor characteristics

Journal

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 385-395

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.01.003

Keywords

organic field-effect transistors; oriented growth; rubrene; pentacene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oriented growth of polycrystalline rubrene thin film on oriented pentacene buffer layer was investigated. The oriented pentacene buffer layer was created by thermal evaporation of pentacene on a rubbed polyvinylalcohol (PVA) surface. The pentacene layer in turn induced the oriented growth of rubrene crystals upon thermal deposition. The structures of successive layers were characterized by using grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) and atomic force microscopy. Highly oriented rubrene crystallites with the a-axis aligning along the surface normal and the (0 0 2) plane preferentially oriented 45 degrees away from the rubbing direction were found. In contrast, the rubrene thin film deposited on PVA or rubbed-PVA substrate without a pentacene buffer layer only gave amorphous phases. With the aligned pentacene/rubrene film as the active layer of organic field-effect transistor, anisotropic mobilities were observed. The highest field-effect mobility (0.105 cm(2)/V s) was observed along the direction 45 degrees away from the rubbing direction and is similar to 4 times higher than that for similar device prepared on unrubbed PVA. The direction was consistent with the GIXD observation that a large number of rubrene crystallites are having their [0 0 2] direction aligning in this direction. A favourable C-H center dot center dot center dot pi interaction between an oriented pentacene layer and the rubrene layer on the control of molecular orientation in the conduction channel of the OFET is suggested. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available