4.6 Article

Virtual screening and biological evaluation of novel small molecular inhibitors against protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1)

Journal

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 12, Issue 47, Pages 9665-9673

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ob01591f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2012AA020302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21210003, 81302700, 81230076, 21272246]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [7131701713]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [13KJB520022]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences (100 Talents Program)
  6. National Science and Technology Major Project Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program [2014ZX09507002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein arginine methylation is a common post-translational modification which is crucial for a variety of biological processes. Dysregulation of protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) activity has been implicated in cancer and other serious diseases. Thus, small molecule inhibitors against PRMT have great potential for therapeutic development. Herein, through the combination of virtual screening and bio-assays, six small molecular compounds were identified as PRMT1 inhibitors. Amongst them, the binding affinity of compounds DCLX069 and DCLX078 with PRMT1 was further validated by T1 rho and saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR experiments. Most important of all, both compounds effectively blocked cell proliferation in breast cancer, liver cancer and acute myeloid leukemia cell lines. The binding mode analysis from molecular docking simulations theoretically indicated that both inhibitors occupied the SAM binding pocket to exert the inhibitory effect. Taken together, our compounds enriched the structural scaffolds as PRMT1 inhibitors and afforded clues for further optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available