4.6 Article

A fluorescent probe for intracellular cysteine overcoming the interference by glutathione

Journal

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 12, Issue 32, Pages 6128-6133

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ob00382a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273107, 51273175]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2012EMZ001]
  3. Shandong University [2011JC006]
  4. State Key Laboratory for Supermolecular Structure and Materials [SKLSSM201419, 2013CB834704]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) [2013CB834702]
  6. University Grants Committee of HKSAR [AoE/P-03/08]
  7. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [HKBU203011, HKUST2/CRF/10]
  8. Hong Kong Baptist University [FRG2/11-12/156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cysteine (Cys) plays important roles in many physiological processes of eukaryotic cells and its detection in cells is of fundamental significance. However, glutathione (GSH), homocysteine, N-acetyl-L-cysteine and other thiols greatly hamper the detection of Cys. In particular, GSH strongly interferes with the detection of cellular Cys (30-200 mu M) due to its high intracellular concentration (1-10 mM). In this work, an off on fluorescent probe (HOTA) for the detection of Cys is presented. This probe possesses both excellent sensitivity and satisfactory selectivity for cellular Cys detection: with the addition of 200 mu M Cys, the fluorescence intensity of the probe (10 mu M) enhanced 117-fold and the detection limit was calculated to be 13.47 mu M, which is lower than the cellular Cys concentration; the probe also selectively detected 30-200 mu M cysteine over 1-10 mM glutathione. Consequently, cell imaging experiments were performed with probe HOTA. Furthermore, the results of the thiol-blocking and GSH synthesis inhibiting experiments confirmed that the intracellular emission mainly originates from the interaction between Cys and HOTA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available