4.6 Article

Symmetric dithiodigalactoside: strategic combination of binding studies and detection of selectivity between a plant toxin and human lectins

Journal

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 9, Issue 15, Pages 5445-5455

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ob01235a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry [CTQ2009-08536, SAF2008-00945, BFU2006-10288, BFU2009-10052]
  2. EC [MRTN-CT-2005-019561, ID 260600]
  3. Verein zur Forderung des biologisch-technologischen Fortschritts in der Medizin e. V.
  4. CIBER of Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES)
  5. Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thioglycosides offer the advantage over O-glycosides to be resistant to hydrolysis. Based on initial evidence of this recognition ability for glycosyldisulfides by screening dynamic combinatorial libraries, we have now systematically studied dithiodigalactoside on a plant toxin (Viscum album agglutinin) and five human lectins (adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins with medical relevance e.g. in tumor progression and spread). Inhibition assays with surface-presented neoglycoprotein and in solution monitored by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy, flanked by epitope mapping, as well as isothermal titration calorimetry revealed binding properties to VAA (K-a: 1560 +/- 20 M (1)). They were reflected by the structural model and the affinity on the level of toxin-exposed cells. In comparison, galectins were considerably less reactive, with intrafamily grading down to very minor reactivity for tandem-repeat-type galectins, as quantitated by radioassays for both domains of galectin-4. Model building indicated contact formation to be restricted to only one galactose moiety, in contrast to thiodigalactoside. The tested glycosyldisulfide exhibits selectivity between the plant toxin and the tested human lectins, and also between these proteins. Therefore, glycosyldisulfides have potential as chemical platform for inhibitor design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available