4.6 Article

Selectivity of small molecule ligands for parallel and anti-parallel DNA G-quadruplex structures

Journal

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 7, Issue 20, Pages 4194-4200

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b910505k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. Association for International Cancer Research
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. University of Nottingham
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E059643/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/E059643/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report CD, ESI-MS and molecular modelling studies of ligand binding interactions with DNA quadruplex structures derived from the human telomeric repeat sequence (h-Tel) and the proto-oncogenic c-kit promoter sequence. These sequences form anti-parallel (both 2 + 2 and 3 + 1) and parallel conformations, respectively, and demonstrate distinctively different degrees of structural plasticity in binding ligands. With h-Tel, we show that an extended heteroaromatic 1,4-triazole (TRZ), designed to exploit p-stacking interactions and groove-specific contacts, shows some selectivity for parallel folds, however, the polycyclic fluorinated acridinium cation (RHPS4), which is a similarly potent telomerase inhibitor, shows selectivity for anti-parallel conformations implicating favourable interactions with lateral and diagonal loops. In contrast, the unique c-kit parallel-stranded quadruplex shows none of the structural plasticity of h-Tel with either ligand. We show by quantitative ESI-MS analysis that both sequences are able to bind a ligand on either end of the quadruplex. In the case of h-Tel the two sites have similar affinities, however, in the case of the c-kit quadruplex the affinities of the two sites are different and ligand-dependent. We demonstrate that two different small molecule architectures result in significant differences in selectivity for parallel and anti-parallel quadruplex structures that may guide quadruplex targeted drug-design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available