4.6 Article

Associations of oral health items of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey with a dental health assessment

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 135-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.019

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Toxicities; Xerostomia; Dental health; Trismus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS) version 2.0 oral symptom subscale addresses underreported oral health issues. We report the associations of xerostomia, dental health, dentures and trismus questions with oral examination findings. Materials and methods: Between May 2011 and April 2012, fifty head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy completed the 50-item VHNSS survey, an oral health assessment by a dentist, salivary flow, and inter-incisal opening (IIO) measurements. Results: Patient reported problems with dry mouth'' correlated with unstimulated salivary flow (-0.43, p = 0.002). Cracked teeth'' (0.55, p = < 0.001) or difficulty chewing due to teeth'' (0.43, p = 0.004) correlated with urgent/emergent dental issues identified on clinical exam. Scores of > 4 on any dental question identified 83% of patients with urgent or emergent needs. The ROC curve separated routine from urgent/emergent dental issues (0.89, p < 0.001). IIO correlated with reported jaw movement limitations'' (-0.43, p = 0.002). Small numbers of patients with dentures precluded meaningful analysis of this sub-sample. Conclusions: Clinically significant oral health issues pertaining to xerostomia, dental health and trismus may be identified using the oral health subscale of the VHNSS version 2.0. MASCC guidelines should be followed by patients with xerostomia. The observation that a score of > 4 is highly predictive of dental issues is important and needs further validation. If confirmed, this would be a useful screening tool for identifying and referring HNC patients for dental care. Patients with trismus should receive physical therapy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available