4.7 Article

Geometric design and mechanical properties of cylindrical foldcore sandwich structures

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 116-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2014.12.017

Keywords

Foldcore; Cylindrical sandwich structure; Geometrical design; Finite element analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sandwich structures with foldcores are regarded as a promising alternative to conventional honeycomb sandwich structures as lightweight structural materials. One of the proposed applications of foldcore sandwich structures is on the aircraft fuselage and the interstage of a rocket. While flat foldcore sandwich structures have been intensively studied in the literature, there lacks a general design tool to create foldcores for a given cylindrical sandwich structure and the mechanical properties of such structures have not been well investigated. In this paper, a geometrical design protocol for foldcores that will fit into the space between the external and internal walls of a given cylindrical sandwich structure is developed based on the vertex method. A parametric study on the mechanical properties of several selected cylindrical foldcore models and a honeycomb core model virtually tested in axial compression, internal pressure and radial crush using the finite element method is performed. It is shown that foldcores outperform the honeycomb core model in axial compression and radial crush but have lower radial stiffness when subjected to internal pressure. The design protocol together with the virtual test results can serve as a useful tool for researchers to design cylindrical foldcore sandwich structures for many potential applications including but not limited to aircraft fuselage, submarine shell and other pressurized cylinders. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available