4.6 Article

Phase II study of vinorelbine/cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing after at least two chemotherapy regimens

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 818-821

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.08.013

Keywords

Vinorelbine; Cetuximab; Recurrent or metastatic SCCHN; Progressive disease; Efficacy; Safety; Oral cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to identify a potentially effective new treatment regimen for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in disease progression after at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. The novel regimen was Cetuximab administered weekly plus Vinorelbine on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days. The regimen was administered to patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck previously treated with surgery, radiotherapy or both and progressing after at least two chemotherapy regimens. Twenty-four patients with histologically confirmed tumors of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were enrolled. All patients were stage IV and 91.6% had an ECOG PS 0-1. After 3 cycles of treatment 23 patients (95.8%) were evaluable for response: 4 patients had partial response; 12 stable disease and 7 progressive disease. Disease control rate was 69.5%. At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.8 months. Median duration of response was 5.2 months. At May 2010, 11/24 (45.8%) patients were alive. The safety profile was quite good. The present study shows that the combination of Vinorelbine and Cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck patients is effective, feasible and has a good safety profile. Our findings warrant further investigation in a wider patient population. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available