4.6 Article

FDG-PET and detection of distant metastases and simultaneous tumors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison with chest radiography and chest CT

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 234-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.024

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Neoplasm metastasis; Second primary neoplasms; Chest CT; FDG-PET

Funding

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection of distant metastases and second primary tumors inpatients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is of importance because of the impact on treatment and prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the value of whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in detecting distant metastases and second primary tumors below clavicular level in HNSCC compared to chest CT and chest radiography (CXR). Patient records of 149 consecutive patients with a primary HNSCC in whom a whole-body FDG-PET for initial staging was performed were reviewed. FDG-PET showed a sensitivity and specificity for detecting distant disease of 92% and 93%, respectively. Chest CT (n = 82) showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 74% and 61% respectively. CXR (n = 106) showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 41% and 91%, respectively. FDG-PET was shown to be able to detect distant metastases and second primary tumors in HNSCC with a high sensitivity and specificity. The higher sensitivity of PET compared to chest CT is mainly due to the detection of extrapulmonary malignancy. Sensitivity of PET and CT were similar in detecting intrapulmonary malignancy, but PET specificity was significantly higher. FDG-PET helps to determine the nature of pulmonary lesions and might be considered as a first diagnostic modality for detecting distant disease in advanced HNSCC. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available