4.6 Article

The determination of the levels of circulating galectin-1 and-3 in HNSCC patients could be used to monitor tumor progression and/or responses to therapy

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 86-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.12.014

Keywords

galectins-1,-3,-7; head cancer; neck cancer; serum; ELISA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate galectin-1, -3 and -7 serum levels as diagnostic and/or prognostic markers for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). ELISA was employed to test sera from 102 patients with HNSCCs and from 38 heatthy control volunteers for galectin-1, -3 and -7 serum levels. Serum galectin levels were assayed by ELISA and the levels of galectin expression in HNSCCs were determined by means of immunohistochemistry. HNSCCs display significant immunohistochemical amounts of galectin-7, but this galectin cannot be detected in the blood of HNSCC patients. Galectin-3 levels differ significantly (p = 0.03) in healthy volunteers and HNSCC patients. Using a threshold value of 4.3 ng/ml, galectin-3 serum level enabled a significant level of discrimination (p = 0.03) to be established between the cancer patients and the healthy volunteers, with 90% level of specificity and 36% level of sensitivity. The discrimination was even better when using a threshold value of 13.5 ng/ml for galectin-1 (p = 0.001), with 100% level of specificity and 22% level of sensitivity. A subgroup of stage IV HNSCC patients displayed significantly reduced levels of circulating gatectin-1 (p = 0.003) and galectin-3 (p = 0.001) after treatment as opposed to before. Galectin-3 concentrations in sera from the patients with a metastatic disease were significantly (p = 0.01) higher than in sera from the patients with Localized tumors. The determination of circulating levels of galectin-1 and -3 could be used to monitor the progression of their disease or their response to therapy. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available