4.6 Article

Characterization of mesenchymal progenitor cells in crown and root pulp from human mesiodentes

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages E86-E97

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12234

Keywords

CD105; human dental pulp; dental pulp progenitor cells; mesiodens; supernumerary teeth

Funding

  1. Nihon University Graduate School of Dentistry [10010105]
  2. Nihon University Research Grant
  3. [21390528]
  4. [24390447]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390447] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveMesiodentes are usually found in the central position of the upper or lower jaw as supernumerary teeth. Here, we obtained 10 mesiodentes and three permanent teeth (PT) and separated the dental pulp (DP) from these into crown and root portions. We then characterized and compared the isolated crown portion-derived cells (crown cells) with root portion-derived cells (root cells) using a range of in vitro assays. Materials and methodsCrown cells and root cells were examined for cell surface marker expression, colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F), cell proliferation, cell cycle characteristics and markers, and osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. ResultsThe proportion of CD105-positive cells (CD105(+) cells) in the crown cells vs the root cells varied among the mesiodentes, but not among the PT. When there were more CD105(+) cells in the root cells than in the crown cells, the root cells showed higher CFU-F, proliferation capacity, and osteogenic differentiation capacity. In contrast, when the crown cells contained more CD105(+) cells than the root cells, the crown cells showed the higher CFU-F, proliferation capacity, and osteogenic differentiation capacity. In addition, the sorted CD105(+) cells showed higher CFU-F and proliferation capacity than the sorted CD105(-) cells. ConclusionThese results indicated that proportion of CD105(+) cells is an effective means of characterizing DP-derived cells in mesiodentes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available