4.6 Article

Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide causes resistin release from neutrophils

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 479-483

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12027

Keywords

neutrophil; resistin; lipopolysaccharide

Funding

  1. Nagasaki University, Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [21592655, 22592338]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21592655, 22592338] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: It was reported that periodontitis is associated with increased serum resistin levels. We examined whether there was a difference between the release of resistin from neutrophils incubated lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Porphyromonas gingivalis and with LPS from Escherichia coli, and which cell-surface receptors and intracellular kinases were involved in this process. METHODS: Several concentrations of P. gingivalis-LPS and E. coli-LPS were added to neutrophils, supernatant from cultured neutrophils was collected, and resistin levels were measured by ELISA. To examine signaling pathways, neutrophils were pretreated with monoclonal antibodies against CD14, CD18, TLR2, and TLR4, and specific inhibitors of PI3K and MAPKs. RESULTS: Resistin release from neutrophils was induced both by P. gingivalis-LPS and E. coli-LPS, but resistin release by P. gingivalis-LPS was weaker than E. coli-LPS in low concentrations. Resistin release was decreased by pretreatment with monoclonal antibodies against CD14, CD18, and TLR4, but not by TLR2. Moreover, it was decreased by inhibitors of PI3K, JNK, and p38 MAPK, but not by ERK1/2. CONCLUSIONS: Resistin release from neutrophils was induced by both P. gingivalis-LPS and E. coli-LPS. This was decreased by CD14, CD18, and TLR4 and was dependent on PI3K, JNK, and p38 MAPK, but not on ERK1/2 in intracellular pathways of neutrophils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available