4.6 Review

Beta-defensins: what are they REALLY doing in the oral cavity?

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 628-635

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01799.x

Keywords

defensin; antimicrobial peptide; oral cancer; innate immunity

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI072245, R21 AI072245-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R21 DE018781, R21 DE018781-02] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [R03 ES016851, R03 ES016851-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Initially identified as broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides, the members of the beta-defensin family have increasingly been observed to exhibit numerous other activities, both in vitro and in vivo, that do not always relate directly to host defense. Much research has been carried out in the oral cavity, where the presence of commensal bacteria further complicates the definition of their role. In addition to direct antimicrobial activity, beta-defensins exhibit potent chemotactic activity for a variety of innate immune cells, as well as stimulating other cells to secrete cytokines. They can also inhibit the inflammatory response, however, by the specific binding of microbe-associated molecular patterns. These patterns are also able to induce the expression of beta-defensins in gingival epithelial cells, although significant differences are observed between different species of bacteria. Together these results suggest a complex model of a host-defense related function in maintenance of bacterial homeostasis and response to pathogens. This model is complicated, however, by numerous other observations of beta-defensin involvement in cell proliferation, wound healing and cancer. Together, the in vitro, in vivo and human studies suggest that these peptides are important in the biology of the oral cavity; exactly how is still subject to speculation. Oral Diseases (2011) 17, 628-635

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available