4.6 Article

Effects of HB-EGF and epiregulin on wound healing of gingival cells in vitro

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages 785-793

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01836.x

Keywords

heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor; epiregulin; gingival tissue; wound healing

Funding

  1. Korea Research Foundation
  2. Korean government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2007-313-E00512]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Gingival wound healing is important to periodontal disease and surgery. This in vitro study was conducted to assess the manner in which heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) and epiregulin cooperatively participate in the wound-healing process in the gingival epithelial and fibroblast cells of the oral mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Gingival epithelium and fibroblast were separated from gingival tissue biopsies and prepared to primary cultures. The changes in the mRNA expression were evaluated via real-time PCR. The effects on cell proliferation, migration, and repopulation were evaluated in vitro. RESULTS: The different regulation of expressions of HB-EGF, epiregulin, and epidermal growth factor receptors was observed over time and with different gingival cell types. HB-EGF exerted a cell migration-inducing effect on both epithelial and fibroblast cells, whereas epiregulin did not. Both growth factors functioned as mitogens for epithelial cell proliferation, but not for fibroblast proliferation. HB-EGF strongly promoted epithelial cell repopulation and mildly promoted fibroblast repopulation, whereas epiregulin promoted only fibroblast repopulation. CONCLUSION: These results indicated that both growth factors might function importantly in the wound-healing process of human gingival tissue via the different regulation of the expression, cell migration, proliferation, and repopulation. Oral Diseases (2011) 17, 785-793

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available