4.6 Article

Expression and alterations of the PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway in ameloblastomas

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 561-568

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01421.x

Keywords

ameloblastoma; dental follicle; phosphatase and tensin homologue; protein kinase B; extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; p70 ribosomal-subunit-6 kinase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Recently, an allelic loss of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) was shown to occur in ameloblastomas. In carcinogenesis, loss of PTEN allows for overactivity of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K / AKT) pathway inducing an upregulation of mammalian-target of rapamycin (mTOR) and its downstream effector ribosomal-subunit-6 kinase (S6K); allowing for uncontrolled cell proliferation, apoptosis inhibition and cell cycle deregulation. METHODS: Thirty ameloblastomas and five dental follicles were studied, looking at the immunohistochemical expression of total PTEN and AKT, as well as their phosphorylated (p) active forms, and the downstream effector and indicator of mTOR activity p70 ribosomal-subunit-6 kinase (pS6K). Also assessed was the expression of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK), which cross talks with AKT. RESULTS: Total PTEN was absent in 33.3% of ameloblastomas, while its stabilized, phosphorylated(ser380 / thr382 / thr383) form was absent in 83.3% of tumors. In contrast, AKT was expressed in 83.3% of ameloblastomas, showing high expression of the p-thr(308)AKT and p-ser(473) AKT forms in 93.3% and 56.6% of cases, respectively. Further, the mTOR activated pS6K(ser240 / 244) was detected in 86.7% of ameloblastomas, while ERK was overexpressed in 70.0% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical analysis of aberrant signaling in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in ameloblastomas may represent a valuable tool for elucidating pathogenesis, aggressiveness and selecting optimal therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available