4.6 Article

Necessary optimality conditions in pessimistic bilevel programming

Journal

OPTIMIZATION
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 505-533

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2012.696641

Keywords

optimization and variational analysis; optimality conditions; pessimistic bilevel programs; sensitivity analysis; two-level value functions; generalized differentiation

Funding

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD)
  2. USA National Science Foundation [DMS-007132]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP-12092508]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
  5. Foundation for Science and Technology, Operational Program for Competitiveness Factors, and Strategic Reference Framework [PTDC/MAT/111809/2009]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/MAT/111809/2009] Funding Source: FCT
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1007132] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article is devoted to the so-called pessimistic version of bilevel programming programs. Minimization problems of this type are challenging to handle partly because the corresponding value functions are often merely upper (while not lower) semicontinuous. Employing advanced tools of variational analysis and generalized differentiation, we provide rather general frameworks ensuring the Lipschitz continuity of the corresponding value functions. Several types of lower subdifferential necessary optimality conditions are then derived by using the lower-level value function approach and the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker representation of lower-level optimal solution maps. We also derive upper subdifferential necessary optimality conditions of a new type, which can be essentially stronger than the lower ones in some particular settings. Finally, certain links are established between the obtained necessary optimality conditions for the pessimistic and optimistic versions in bilevel programming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available