4.6 Article

Impact of maternal heat stress at insemination on the subsequent reproductive performance of Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 9, Pages 1523-1529

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.040

Keywords

Holstein; Brown Swiss; Crossbred; Reproduction; Temperature-humidity index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat stress in hot environments is one of the major factors that can negatively affect milk production, reproduction, and the health of dairy cows. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of maternal heat stress at insemination on the subsequent reproductive performance of the pure Holstein (HO), Brown Swiss (BS), and their F-1 crossbred (BF) cows, under subtropical Egyptian conditions. The influence of temperature humidity index (THI) on the pregnancy rate, fetal loss rate, calving traits, and reproductive indices were investigated. Fetal loss rate of pure HO was significantly increased from 17.1% at low THI to 24.9% at greater THI (odds ratio = 2.09; P = 0.032). Furthermore, abortion and stillbirth rates of pure HO were significantly increased from 3.6% and 3.8%, respectively, at low THI to 7.2% and 5.9%, respectively, at greater THI (odds ratio = 2.17 and 2.58; P = 0.037 and 0.031, respectively). In contrast, BS and BF cows can tolerate the heat stress, as there were no differences in the fetal loss, abortion, and calving difficulty rates at the different levels of THI. Pure HO cows had a significant longer calving interval and days open at high THI (449 and 173 days, respectively), compared with low THI (421 and 146 days, respectively). On the contrary, BS and BF cows had no difference in the calving interval at the different levels of THI. Our results indicate that pure BS and BF cows have a better adaptability and competent reproductive performance than pure HO under subtropical conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available