4.6 Article

What makes single-helical metamaterials generate pure circularly polarized light?

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 1552-1560

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.001552

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11104094, 61007019, 50735007]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [200804871147]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China [2008CDB004]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST) [2010MS063, 2011TS060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circular polarizers with left-handed helical metamaterials can transmit right-handed circularly polarized (RCP) light with few losses. But a certain amount of left-handed circularly polarized (LCP) light will occur in the transmitted light, which is the noise of the circular polarizer. Therefore, we defined the ratio of the RCP light intensity to the LCP light intensity as the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. In our previous work, it's found that circular polarizers with multi-helical metamaterials have two orders higher S/N ratios than that of single-helical metamaterials. However, it has been a great challenge to fabricate such multi-helical structures with micron or sub-micron feature sizes. Is it possible for the single-helical metamaterials to obtain equally high S/N ratios as the multi-helical ones? To answer this question, we systematically investigated the influences of structure parameters of single-helical metamaterials on the S/N ratios using the finite-different time-domain (FDTD) method. It was found that the single-helical metamaterials can also reach about 30dB S/N ratios, which are equal to the multi-helical ones. Furthermore, we explained the phenomenon by the antenna theory and optimized the performances of the single-helical circular polarizers. (C)2012 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available