4.6 Article

Bright dual-mode green emission from selective set of dopant ions in β-Na(Y,Gd)F4:Yb,Er/β-NaGdF4:Ce,Tb core/shell nanocrystals

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages 17107-17118

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.017107

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Future key technology program
  2. Korea Institute of Science and Technology
  3. industrial strategic technology development program [10035274]
  4. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE, Korea)
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10035296] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2E2274] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bright dual-mode green-emitting core/shell nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by doping selective set of lanthanide ions. Up-conversion (UC) green-emitting beta-NaY0.2Gd0.6F4:Yb-0.18,Er-0.02 NPs (8.3 nm) were used as core material. Bright down-conversion (DC) green-emitting beta-NaGd0.8F4:Ce-0.15,Tb-0.05 NPs showed ca. 31 times higher photoluminescence (PL) intensity than beta-NaGdF4:Tb NPs and they were served as shell material with their excellent PL properties. The UC/DC core/shell NPs showed bright green light under excitations of 980 nm near infrared (NIR) light and 254 nm ultraviolet (UV) light, respectively. The UC/DC core/shell NPs showed ca. 11 times higher UC PL intensity than core UCNPs. Consequently, the core/shell NPs doped with selective set of lanthanide ions showed bright dual-mode green emission under excitations of NIR light and UV light, indicating that they are promising for application to optical imaging. (C) 2012 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available