4.6 Article

Time-resolved pump-probe experiments at the LCLS

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages 17620-17630

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.18.017620

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER15614]
  4. NSF [PHY-0649578]
  5. DOE-BES [DE-FG02-92ER14299]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  8. Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT)
  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-92ER14299, DE-FG02-04ER15614] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Physics [0969322] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first time-resolved x-ray/optical pump-probe experiments at the SLAC Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) used a combination of feedback methods and post-analysis binning techniques to synchronize an ultrafast optical laser to the linac-based x-ray laser. Transient molecular nitrogen alignment revival features were resolved in time-dependent x-ray-induced fragmentation spectra. These alignment features were used to find the temporal overlap of the pump and probe pulses. The strong-field dissociation of x-ray generated quasi-bound molecular dications was used to establish the residual timing jitter. This analysis shows that the relative arrival time of the Ti:Sapphire laser and the x-ray pulses had a distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 120 fs. The largest contribution to the jitter noise spectrum was the locking of the laser oscillator to the reference RF of the accelerator, which suggests that simple technical improvements could reduce the jitter to better than 50 fs. (C) 2010 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available