4.7 Article

Statistical analysis and optimization of process parameters in Ti6Al4V laser cladding using Nd:YAG laser

Journal

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 985-995

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.01.018

Keywords

Laser cladding; Response surface methodology (RSM); Titanium alloy

Categories

Funding

  1. NSFC [51075054]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB706800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The process parameters of laser cladding have great effect on the clad geometry and dilution. This investigation focuses on the influence of laser power (400-600 W), scanning speed (500-700 mm/min) and powder feed rate (30-60 rev/min) on the shape factor and the cladding-bead geometry (layer width, layer height and molten depth) with regard to injecting Ti6Al4V (TC4) powder on TC4 substrate. The experimental design technique, central composite design (CCD) and response surface methodology (RSM) are used to build the mathematical model. By means of the developed model tested by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) method, the relationship between process parameters and output responses and the interaction among the process parameter are analyzed and discussed in detail. The analysis results indicate that powder feed rate is the dominant factor on the width and height of cladding coating while laser scanning speed has the strongest effect on molten depth of substrate. Finally, the validation results show that the calculated values are in good agreement with measured responses within the allowable range of cladding parameters being used. This makes it possible to acquire a good parameter combination for dilution control. Based on the results of optimization, it is observed that the low level of laser power and high level of laser scanning speed can produce cladding coatings with good quality when powder feed rate is around the center value. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available