4.6 Article

Substitution of Y3+ for Gd3+ on the luminescent properties of BaGd2O4:Eu3+ scintillating phosphors

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 1478-1483

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2014.03.044

Keywords

BaGd2O4:Eu3+ scintillating phosphors; Photoluminescence; X-ray excited luminescence; Thermoluminescence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [11165010]
  2. Jiangxi Province [20114BAB202002]
  3. Training Program of Young Scientists (Jing-Gang Star) in Jiangxi Province [20133BCB23023]
  4. Scientific Project of Department of Education in Jiangxi Province [GJJ12462]
  5. Key Subject of Atomic & Molecular Physics in Jiangxi Province
  6. Open Fund of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Special Artificial Microstructure Materials and Technology of Tongji University [ammt-2012-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The BaGd1.8-xYxEu0.2O4 (0 <= x <= 1.8) phosphors were synthesized by the conventional high temperature solid-state reaction (SSR) method at 1300 degrees C in air. The structure and optical performances of the as-synthesized phosphors were characterized using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), excitation and emission spectra, X-ray excited luminescence (XEL) and thermoluminescence (TL) spectra. The XRD results reveal that the structure of the BaGd2O4 host are not alternated by the gradual substitution of Y3+ for Gd3+ ions. Both energy transfer and competitive absorption between Gd3+ and Eu3+ ions may coexist by the excitation and emission spectra. The XEL intensity increases with the elevated substitution ratios, i.e. the x values. The strongest XEL intensity increases by a factor of about 10 when compared with the x = 1.8 and x = 0.0 phosphors. The possible mechanism of enhancing Eu3+ emission was also discussed by the TL properties of BaGd1.8-xYxEu0.2O4 phosphors by the gradual substitution of Y3+ for Gd3+ ions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available