4.6 Article

The Brillouin gain coefficient of Yb-doped aluminosilicate glass optical fibers

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1627-1632

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2013.04.006

Keywords

Ytterbium; Optical fiber; Pockels coefficients; Brillouin scattering; Stimulated brillouin scattering; Fiber lasers

Funding

  1. Joint Technology Office HEL-MRI Program [W911NF-12-1-0602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Provided herein is a detailed analysis of the Brillouin spectroscopy of the ytterbia (Yb2O3) dopant in aluminosilicate glass optical fibers. Yb-doped fiber lasers have become ubiquitous, and the results presented here may be used to design lasers and amplifiers for narrow linewidth systems and applications. It is found, with a high degree of certainty, that Yb2O3 has an acoustic velocity that is lower than that of silica, a Brillouin spectral width (or material acoustic damping coefficient) that is about 80 times greater than that of silica, and photoelastic constants (Pockets' coefficients) that are negative. It is found that the primary influence of ytterbia in concentrations typical of active fibers is to broaden the Brillouin gain spectrum, thereby reducing the peak Brillouin gain. A set of design curves is provided outlining the Brillouin gain coefficient as a function of alumina concentration for several ytterbia concentrations, which can be utilized to design fiber structures with reduced Brillouin gain. The Yb-doped aluminosilicate fiber system is compared to the Yb-doped phosphosilicate system, and a high degree of similarity is found between them at low Al2O3 or P2O5 doping levels. However, for fiber produced utilizing conventional techniques, the phosphosilicates are found to have the potential for lower Brillouin gain since more P2O5 can be reliably incorporated into the glassy matrix. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available