4.3 Article

Charge state of ∼1 to 50 keV ions after passing through graphene and ultrathin carbon foils

Journal

OPTICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.OE.53.2.024101

Keywords

graphene; carbon foil; space plasma instrument; energetic neutral atom; charge exchange

Categories

Funding

  1. Southwest Research Institute
  2. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, Advanced Technology Center
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1102572] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon foils have been used reliably for many decades in space plasma instrumentation to detect ions and energetic neutral atoms (ENA). When these particles pass through a foil, secondary electrons are emitted on both sides. Those electrons are used for coincidence detection and/or timing signals. Ultrathin carbon foils are also used to convert an ENA into an ion for further analysis. The interaction of particles with carbon foils also includes unwanted effects such as energy straggling and angular scattering, both of which scale with foil thickness. Therefore, it has always been a goal to use foils as thin as practically possible. The foils used in space are usually made of amorphous carbon of roughly a hundred atomic layers. Graphene can be made much thinner, even down to a single atomic layer, and is therefore a natural candidate for this kind of application. We evaluate one aspect of the interaction of particles with foils: charge exchange. We show the first measurements of exit charge state distributions of similar to 1 to 50 keV ions passing through self-supported graphene foils. We compare the charge state fraction of exiting particles with state-of-the-art amorphous carbon foils. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available