Journal
OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 10, Pages 1863-1870Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.023
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- That Man May See Foundation at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
- South Asia Research Fund
- National Eye Institute [U10 EY021125-01]
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- National Eye Institute (NIH-NEI) [EY002162]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To compare the relative effectiveness of methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis. Design: Multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked clinical trial. Participants: Eighty patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai and Coimbatore, India. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive 25 mg weekly oral methotrexate or 1 g twice daily oral mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored monthly for 6 months. Oral prednisone and topical corticosteroids were tapered. Main Outcome Measures: Masked examiners assessed the primary outcome of treatment success, defined by achieving the following at 5 and 6 months: (1) <= 0.5+ anterior chamber cells, <= 0.5+ vitreous cells, <= 0.5+ vitreous haze and no active retinal/choroidal lesions in both eyes, (2) <= 10 mg of prednisone and <= 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% a day, and (3) no declaration of treatment failure because of intolerability or safety. Additional outcomes included time to sustained corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation, change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, resolution of macular edema, adverse events, subgroup analysis by anatomic location, and medication adherence. Results: Forty-one patients were randomized to methotrexate and 39 to mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 67 patients (35 methotrexate, 32 mycophenolate mofetil) contributed to the primary outcome. Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved treatment success with methotrexate and 47% with mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.09). Treatment failure from adverse events or tolerability was not different by treatment arm (P = 0.99). There were no differences between treatment groups in time to corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (P = 0.44), change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.68), or resolution of macular edema (P = 0.31). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation between patients receiving methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. However, there was a 22% difference in treatment success favoring methotrexate. (C) 2014 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available