4.6 Article

Surgical versus Medical Treatment of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia A Comparison of Recurrences and Complications

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 994-1000

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.017

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Center Core Grant [P30EY014801]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness unrestricted grant, Department of Defense [W81XWH-09-1-0675]
  3. The Ronald and Alicia Lepke Grant
  4. The Lee and Claire Hager Grant
  5. The Jimmy and Gaye Bryan Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Treatment for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) has historically been surgery, but nonsurgical interventions are increasingly used. Treatment with interferon is efficacious, but evidence is needed regarding recurrence and complication rates in comparison with surgery. The objective of this study is to compare the recurrence and complication rates of surgical treatment and interferon treatment for OSSN. Design: A matched, case-control study. Participants: Ninety-eight patients with OSSN, 49 of whom were treated with interferon (IFN) alpha 2b therapy and 49 of whom were treated with surgical intervention. Methods: Patients with OSSN were treated with surgery versus IFN alpha 2b therapy, either in topical or injection form. Median follow-up after lesion resolution was 21 months (range, 0=173 months) for the IFN alpha 2b group and 24 months (range, 0.9-108 months) for the surgery group. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure for the study was the rate of recurrence of OSSN in each of the treatment groups. Recurrence rates were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Mean patient age and sex were similar between the groups. There was a trend toward higher clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor grade in the IFN alpha 2b group. Despite this, the number of recurrences was equal at 3 per group. The 1-year recurrence rate was 5% in the surgery group versus 3% in the IFN alpha 2b group (P = 0.80). There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the surgically and medically treated groups. Nonlimbal location was a risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 8.96) in the entire study population. In patients who were treated successfully, the side effects of the 2 treatments were similar, with mild discomfort seen in the majority of patients in both groups. There was no limbal stem cell deficiency, symblepharon, or diplopia noted in either group. Two patients were excluded from the IFN alpha 2b group because of intolerance to the medication. Conclusions: No difference in the recurrence rate of OSSN was found between surgical versus IFN alpha 2b therapy. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 994-1000 (C) 2014 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available