4.6 Article

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 11, Pages 2247-2254

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer HealthCare
  2. Genentech
  3. Regeneron Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  4. Allergan
  5. Alcon
  6. Novartis
  7. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  8. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  9. GSK
  10. Heidelberg Engineering
  11. Optos
  12. Pfizer
  13. Acucela
  14. Aerpio
  15. Alimera
  16. Genzyme
  17. Kato Pharmaceutical
  18. Lpath
  19. Ohr
  20. Ophthotech
  21. QLT
  22. Santen
  23. Senju
  24. Wacamoto
  25. Thrombogenics
  26. Allergan,
  27. Quark
  28. AbbVie
  29. Santen, Inc.
  30. Fovea
  31. Kanghong Biotech
  32. Ohr Pharma
  33. Oraya
  34. Sanofi
  35. XcoveryVision
  36. Abbott
  37. Ampio
  38. Opthotech
  39. pSivida
  40. Xoma
  41. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
  42. Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: A head-to-head comparison was performed between vascular endothelial growth factor blockade and laser for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Two similarly designed, double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVIDDME. Participants: We included 872 patients (eyes) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with DME with central involvement. Methods: Eyes received either intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints at week 52 included the proportion of eyes that gained >= 15 letters from baseline and the mean change from baseline in central retinal thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography. Results: Mean BCVA gains from baseline to week 52 in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus the laser group were 12.5 and 10.7 versus 0.2 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 10.5 and 10.7 versus 1.2 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. The corresponding proportions of eyes gaining >= 15 letters were 41.6% and 31.1% versus 7.8% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 32.4% and 33.3% versus 9.1% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. Similarly, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 185.9 and 183.1 versus 73.3 mu m (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 195.0 and 192.4 versus 66.2 mu m (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. Overall incidences of ocular and nonocular adverse events and serious adverse events, including the Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events and vascular deaths, were similar across treatment groups. Conclusions: At week 52, IAI demonstrated significant superiority in functional and anatomic endpoints over laser, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups despite the extended dosing interval in the 2q8 group. In general, IAI was well-tolerated. (C) 2014 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available