4.6 Article

Improved Vision-Related Function after Ranibizumab for Macular Edema after Retinal Vein Occlusion Results from the BRAVO and CRUISE Trials

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 10, Pages 2108-2118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.017

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Allergan
  2. Genentech
  3. Optovue
  4. Pfizer
  5. Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.
  6. Alimera Sciences
  7. Allergan USA, Inc.
  8. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
  9. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.
  10. DIAGNOS Inc.
  11. ForSight Labs, LLC
  12. Genentech, Inc
  13. Genzyme Corporation
  14. Lumenis, Inc
  15. Notal Vision
  16. Novartis Pharma AG
  17. Ora, Inc
  18. Pfizer, Inc
  19. Quark Biotech, Inc
  20. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  21. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc
  22. Steba Biotech S.A.
  23. EMMES Corporation
  24. Office of Research Administration
  25. Alcon
  26. National Institutes of Health
  27. IH
  28. Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To examine the impact of intravitreal ranibizumab on patient-reported visual function using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) through 6 months in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch or central retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design: Two multicenter, double-masked trials, which enrolled participants with ME secondary to branch or central RVO: the RanibizumaB for the Treatment of Macular Edema following BRAnch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) trial or the Central Retinal Vein OcclUsIon Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) trial. Participants: Three hundred ninety-seven BRAVO and 392 CRUISE patients. Methods: Patients were randomized 1: 1: 1 to monthly sham, 0.3-mg, or 0.5-mg injections of ranibizumab for 6 months. Main Outcome Measures: Although visual acuity was the main outcome measure for the trials, mean change from baseline in NEI VFQ-25 scores at month 6 was a secondary outcome measure. Results: In BRAVO, among the 132, 134, and 131 patients randomized, respectively, to sham, 0.3 mg ranibizumab, or 0.5 mg ranibizumab, the study eye was the worse-seeing eye in 121 (91.7%), 118 (88.1%), and 125 (95.4%) patients and 123 (93.2%), 128 (95.5%), and 125 (95.4%), respectively, had a 6-month follow-up visit. In CRUISE, among the 130, 132, and 130 patients randomized, respectively, to sham, 0.3 mg ranibizumab, and 0.5 mg ranibizumab, the study eye was the worse-seeing eye in 117 (90.0%), 123 (93.2%), and 120 (92.3%) patients and 115 (88.5%), 129 (97.7%), and 119 (91.5%), respectively, had a 6-month follow-up visit. In both trials, patients treated with ranibizumab reported greater mean improvements in visual function, with substantial differences observed as early as month 1, including the NEI VFQ-25 composite score and near and distance activities subscales, compared with sham patients. P values for comparisons with sham for the composite score and these 2 subscales were <0.05. Conclusions: These results from the BRAVO and CRUISE trials indicate that patients with ME from RVOs treated with monthly ranibizumab report greater improvements in vision-related function compared with sham-treated patients through 6 months, even when a majority of patients present with RVOs in the worse-seeing eye. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2012; 119:2108-2118 (C) 2012 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available