4.6 Article

Expanded 2-Year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 609-614

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. Department of Health and Human Services [EY-14231, EY-14229, EY-18817]
  5. Genentech
  6. Allergan, Inc.
  7. Pfizer
  8. Alcon
  9. Allergan
  10. Office of Research Administration
  11. Bausch Lomb
  12. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  13. EMMES Corporation
  14. Lumenis
  15. Notal Vision
  16. Novartis
  17. QLT
  18. Regeneron
  19. Steba Biotech
  20. Abbott Medical Optics
  21. ForSight Labs
  22. LLC
  23. Genzyme Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To report expanded 2-year follow-up of a previously reported randomized trial evaluating intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab or 4 mg triamcinolone combined with focal/grid laser compared with focal/grid laser alone for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Participants: A total of 854 study eyes of 691 participants with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 (approximate Snellen equivalent) and DME involving the fovea. Methods: Continuation of procedures previously reported for the randomized trial. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity and safety at the 2-year visit. Results: At the 2-year visit, compared with the sham + prompt laser group, the mean change in the visual acuity letter score from baseline was 3.7 letters greater in the ranibizumab + prompt laser group (95% confidence interval adjusted for multiple comparisons [aCI], -0.4 to +7.7), 5.8 letters greater in the ranibizumab + deferred laser group (95% aCI, +1.9 to +9.8), and 1.5 letters worse in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group (95% aCI, -5.5 to +2.4). After the 1- to 2-year visit in the ranibizumab + prompt or deferred laser groups, the median numbers of injections were 2 and 3 (potential maximum of 13), respectively. At the 2-year visit, the percentages of eyes with central subfield thickness >= 250 mu m were 59% in the sham + prompt laser group, 43% in the ranibizumab + prompt laser group, 42% in the ranibizumab + deferred laser group, and 52% in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group. No systemic events attributable to study treatment were apparent. Three eyes in 3 (0.8%) of 375 participants had injection-related endophthalmitis in the ranibizumab groups, whereas elevated intraocular pressure and cataract surgery were more frequent in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group. Conclusions: The expanded 2-year results reported are similar to results published previously and reinforce the conclusions originally reported: Ranibizumab should be considered for patients with DME and characteristics similar to those of the cohort in this clinical trial, including vision impairment with DME involving the center of the macula. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2011;118:609-614 (C) 2011 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available