4.6 Article

Uveitis in a Patient Treated with Bacille-Calmette-Guerin Possible Antigenic Mimicry of Mycobacterial and Retinal Antigens

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 12, Pages 2457-2462

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.021

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [SFB 571]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate the cellular immune response in uveitis developing after intravesical Bacille-Calmette-Guerin (BCG) applications. Design: Experimental study. Participants: A 72-year-old HLA-1327-negative patient with bilateral granulomatous anterior uveitis that developed during the third cycle of intravesical BCG applications she was receiving for treatment of bladder carcinoma. Methods: The patient's peripheral T cell reactivity to ocular autoantigens was compared with the response to purified protein derivative (PPD) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. T-cell proliferation and cytokine and chemokine secretion were measured in vitro. Main Outcome Measures: Anterior uveitis was treated successfully with topical corticosteroids and cycloplegics. Results: The following were demonstrated: proliferation to PPD, interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP), and IRBP-peptide R16, as well as secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in response to PPD, retinal soluble antigen (S-Ag), IRBP, cellular retinal-binding protein (CRALBP), and some S-Ag and IRBP peptides. Conclusions: These data indicate the generation of a polyclonal autoimmune reaction elicited by BCG. Amino acid sequence alignments revealed homologies between proteins from M. tuberculosis, BCG, and retinal antigens, suggesting antigenic mimicry as a potential cause of uveitis in this patient. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2009,116:2457-2462 (C) 2009 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available