4.3 Article

Pharmacological Enhancement of ex vivo Gene Therapy Neuroprotection in a Rodent Model of Retinal Degeneration

Journal

OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 32-38

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000325730

Keywords

Gene therapy; Retinitis pigmentosa; Stem cells

Categories

Funding

  1. British Retinitis Pigmentosa Society [GR550]
  2. Crystal Family Medical Charitable Trust
  3. St. Mary's Paddington Charitable Trust [L44]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: We have previously shown the benefits of cell-based delivery of neuroprotection in a rodent model of retinitis pigmentosa (RP). In order to maximise the effectiveness of this approach, we hypothesised that this could be augmented by combination with an aminoglycoside known to limit the abnormal RNA translation seen in this model. Methods: A rhodopsin TgN S334ter-4 rat model of RP underwent daily subcutaneous injection of 12.5 mu g/g gentamicin from postnatal day 5 (P5). At P21, selected rats also underwent intravitreal injection of cells genetically engineered to oversecrete glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor. Histological imaging was undertaken to evaluate photoreceptor survival at P70 and compared with images from untreated TgN S334ter-4 rats and control Sprague-Dawley rats. Results: Statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in outer retinal indices were seen with this combination strategy when compared with results in rats treated with individual therapies alone. This improvement was most apparent in the peripheral retina, where the greatest degeneration was observed. Conclusions: We have shown that the combination of neuroprotection plus aminoglycoside read-through in an animal model of retinal degeneration improved the histological appearance of the retina such that it was statistically indistinguishable from unaffected controls. Further functional and longitudinal studies of this approach are warranted. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available