4.1 Article

Use of Hyaluronic Acid Gel in the Treatment of Lagophthalmos in Sunken Superior Sulcus Syndrome

Journal

OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 175-179

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000040

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the use of hyaluronic acid gel in the management of lagophthalmos in sunken superior sulcus syndrome. Introduction: Lagophthalmos associated with orbital fat atrophy and deep superior sulcus is a known entity described previously. Orbital fat atrophy results in deep superior sulcus where skin, orbicularis muscle, and orbital septum retract posteriorly in the deep superior sulcus, leading to lagophthalmos from suboptimal orbicularis function and effective skin shortening. The authors define this condition as sunken superior sulcus syndrome (SSSS) when the deep superior sulcus leads to exposure keratopathy. Thus, the syndrome consists of deep superior sulcus, lagophthalmos, and exposure keratopathy. Although the use of hyaluronic acid gel has been proposed as a management option for paralytic lagophthalmos, its application in the treatment of lagophthalmos in SSSS has not been reported. Methods: In this study, 5 patients (10 eyelids) with SSSS were injected with hyaluronic acid gel in the superior sulcus of the upper eyelid. Injected amount was titrated until the desired point was reached: complete or nearly complete eyelid closure. Results: After an average follow up of 9.5 months, lagoph thalmos improved by 2 mm or 69% (p = 0.02) on the right side and by 1 mm or 71% (p = 0.01) on the left side. Most patients also reported significantly improved ocular comfort and appearance of the superior sulcus. The only complications noted were bruising and temporary uneven contour of the upper eyelid sulcus. Conclusions: Management of lagophthalmos in SSSS with hyaluronic acid gel is an effective and safe alternative to surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available