4.0 Article

Recessive Mutations in LEPREL1 Underlie a Recognizable Lens Subluxation Phenotype

Journal

OPHTHALMIC GENETICS
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 58-63

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13816810.2014.985847

Keywords

Ectopia lentis; lens subluxation; LEPREL1

Funding

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology [10-BIO 1350-20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To uncover the homozygous recessive gene mutation underlying familial lens subluxation and/or juvenile lens opacities in four sisters from a consanguineous family. Methods: Prospective family study (clinical phenotyping; homozygosity-analysis-guided candidate gene testing). Results: The proband was a 14-year-old girl with long-standing poor vision, bilateral temporal lens subluxation, lens opacities, and axial high myopia. There were no syndromic findings, and fibrillin-1 sequencing was normal. Three sisters, also non-syndromic, had undergone bilateral juvenile lens surgery (two for juvenile cataract, 1 for lens subluxation) within the first two decades of life. Both sisters who had cataract surgery developed bilateral post-operative retinal detachments and one had documented lens instability during cataract surgery. Genetic analysis revealed the phenotype to segregate with a novel homozygous recessive mutation in LEPREL1 (c.292delC; p.Gly100Alafs*104). Recessive mutations in this gene were recently highlighted as a cause for axial myopia and early-onset cataract in two families for whom some affected members also had ectopia lentis and/or post-operative retinal detachments. Conclusions: Recessive LEPREL1 mutations should be recognized as part of the differential diagnosis of lens subluxation. The associated phenotype is non-syndromic and distinguishable from other causes of ectopia lentis in the context of its additional features: juvenile lens opacities, axial myopia, and a predisposition to retinal tears/detachment following intraocular surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available