4.5 Article

Mining Coal or Finding Terrorists: The Expanding Search Paradigm

Journal

OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 265-279

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1120.1134

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show how to optimize the search for a hidden object, terrorist, or simply Hider, located at a point H according to a known or unknown distribution v on a rooted network Q. We modify the traditional pathwise search approach to a more general notion of expanding search. When the Hider is restricted to the nodes of Q, an expanding search S consists of an ordering (a(1), a(2), ... ) of the arcs of a spanning subtree such that the root node is in a(1) and every arc a(i) is adjacent to a previous arc a(j), j < i. If a(k) contains H, the search time T is lambda(a(1)) + ... + lambda(a(k)), where lambda is length measure on Q. For more general distributions v, an expanding search S is described by the nested family of connected sets S(t) that specify the area of Q that has been covered by time t. S(0) is the root, lambda(S(t)) = t, and T = min{t: H is an element of S(t)}. For a known Hider distribution v on a tree Q, the expected time minimizing strategy <(S)over bar> begins with the rooted subtree Q' maximizing the density v(Q')/lambda(Q'). (For arbitrary networks, we use this criterion on all spanning subtrees.) The search (S) over bar can be interpreted as the optimal method of mining known coal seams, when the time to move miners or machines is negligible compared to digging time. When the Hider distribution is unknown, we consider the zero-sum search game where the Hider picks H, the Searcher S, and the payoff is T. For trees Q, the value is V = (lambda(Q) D)/2, where D is a mean distance from root to leaf nodes. If Q is 2-arc connected, V = lambda(Q)/2. Applications and interpretations of the expanding search paradigm are given, particularly to multiple agent search.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available