Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2008)
Savvy searching - Google Scholar revisited
Peter Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2008)
The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases
Peter Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2008)
The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Scopus
Peter Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2008)
The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar
Peter Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2008)
Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study
Ylva Gavel et al.
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2008)
Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
Judit Bar-Ilan
SCIENTOMETRICS (2008)
Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview
Christoph Neuhaus et al.
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION (2008)
Google Scholar goes to school: The presence of google scholar on college and university web sites
Chris Neuhaus et al.
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP (2008)
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
Lokman I. Meho et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2007)
Coverage analysis of Scopus:: A journal metric approach
Felix De Moya-Anegon et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2007)
On the robustness of the h-index
Jerome K. Vanclay
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2007)
Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field
William H. Walters
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (2007)
Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature
Michael Norris et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)
The R- and AR-indices:: Complementing the h-index
Jin BiHui et al.
CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN (2007)
Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship
Charles Oppenheim
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2007)
Some measures for comparing citation databases
Judit Bar-Ilan et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)
Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index
M. Schreiber
EPL (2007)
Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators
Peter Vinkler
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (2007)
Putting Google Scholar to the test: a preliminary study
Mary L. Robinson et al.
PROGRAM-ELECTRONIC LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2007)
An exploratory study of Google Scholar
Philipp Mayr et al.
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2007)
The dimensions of cited reference enhanced database subsets
Peter Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2007)
Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists
Blaise Cronin et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2006)
The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study
Chris Neuhaus et al.
PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY (2006)
h-index sequence and h-index matrix:: Constructions and applications
Liming Liang
SCIENTOMETRICS (2006)
Theory and practise of the g-index
Leo Egghe
SCIENTOMETRICS (2006)
Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts
Peter Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2006)
Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
L Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2005)
Google Scholar: The new generation of citation indexes
A Noruzi
LIBRI (2005)
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
JE Hirsch
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2005)
Google Scholar: the pros and the cons
P Jacso
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2005)
Share Paper
