4.5 Article

Interleukin-4 receptor α-based hybrid peptide effectively induces antitumor activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 2147-2153

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2387

Keywords

interleukin-4 receptor alpha; hybrid peptide; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; molecular-targeted therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [24390449, 2368009, 23659934]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659827, 23390318, 25560364, 24390449, 23659934, 22390379, 25282172] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interleukin-4 receptor alpha (IL-4R alpha) is highly expressed on the surface of various human solid tumors including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We designed a novel IL-4R alpha-lytic hybrid peptide composed of a binding peptide to IL-4R alpha and a cell-lytic peptide. In the present study, we evaluated the antitumor activity of the IL-4Ra-lytic hybrid peptide as a novel molecular-targeted therapy in HNSCC. Immunoblot analysis revealed that IL-4R alpha was expressed in all tested HNSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, Ca9-22 and OSC-19), but not in a human normal keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell line. Immunohistochemical expression levels of IL-4R alpha in HNSCC tissues were higher compared to those in normal epithelial tissue. The IL-4R alpha-lytic hybrid peptide showed cytotoxic activity in all five cancer cell lines with a concentration that killed 50% of all cells (IC50) as low as 10 mu M. HaCaT cells were less sensitive to this peptide with an IC50 of >30 mu M. In addition, intratumoral administration of IL-4R alpha-lytic hybrid peptide significantly inhibited tumor growth in a xenograft model of human HNSCC in vivo. These results indicate that the IL-4R alpha-lytic hybrid peptide may serve as a potent agent to provide a novel therapy for patients with HNSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available