4.4 Article

Retrospective Analysis of Adjuvant Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Effect Prognosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 5-6, Pages 289-295

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000329075

Keywords

Intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy; Advanced gastric cancer; Peritoneal carcinomatosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (IPC) in resectable gastric cancer through retrospective analysis. Methods: Three hundred and sixty T2-4bN0-3M0 resectable gastric cancer patients were included in this study. One hundred and eighty-four patients used systemic chemotherapy combined with IPC (IP+ group) and 176 systemic chemotherapy only (IP- group). Results: With a median of 49.9 months of follow-up, the 5-year overall survival in IP+ patients was significantly better than in IP- patients (60.4 vs. 42.9%; p = 0.001), and the average progression-free survival in IP+ patients was significantly longer than in IP- patients (60.5 vs. 46.2 months; p = 0.001). Relapse rates of peritoneal carcinomatosis, celiac lymph node and hepatic metastasis in the IP+ patients were significantly lower than in the IP- patients. Patients with curative resection, a histological type other than mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma, low and undifferentiated tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, and T3 and T4a benefited from adjuvant IPC. The toxicities were the same except for more patients with leukopenia in the IP+ group (p = 0.001). The number of cycles of IPC and the time of IPC start after surgery had an impact on overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion: Adjuvant IPC for resectable gastric cancer gave encouraging results and large multicenter prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available