4.4 Article

Negative Prognostic Impact of the Coexpression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and c-erbB-2 in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 133-141

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000195539

Keywords

Cervical cancer; c-erbB-2; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Heterodimerization; Pelvic relapse-free survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Roche Farma Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective was to determine the impact of the coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) and tumor marker c-erbB-2 on disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic relapse-free survival (PRFS) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: The expression of EGFR and c-erbB-2 was assessed by immunohistochemistry, which was centralized and blinded to outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of EGFR and c-erbB-2 on DFS and PRFS. Results: 170 patients with LACC were included and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 25 (15%) biopsies were considered EGFR and c-erbB-2 positive; 100 (59%) were either EGFR or c-erbB-2 positive, and 45 (26%) were EGFR and c-erbB-2 negative. The 3- and 5-year DFS was 39% each for EGFR- and c-erbB-2-positive patients, 54 and 49%, respectively, for EGFR- or c-erbB-2-positive patients, and 76 and 72%, respectively, for EGFR- and c-erbB-2-negative patients ( p = 0.006). EGFR- and c-erbB-2-positive tumors were significantly associated with a decrease in PRFS ( hazard ratio, HR, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.44-11.05, p = 0.007), and DFS ( HR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.26-6.66, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with LACC coexpressing EGFR and c-erbB-2, and treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, had a worse clinical prognosis with shorter DFS and PRFS. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available