4.7 Article

Disparities in Underserved White Populations: The Case of Cancer-Related Disparities in Appalachia

Journal

ONCOLOGIST
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 1072-1081

Publisher

ALPHAMED PRESS
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0145

Keywords

Disparities; Appalachia; Cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Appalachia Community Cancer Network [U01 114622]
  2. Merck
  3. NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are meaningful cancer-related disparities in the Appalachian region of the U. S. To address these disparities, the Appalachia Community Cancer Network (ACCN), a collaboration of investigators and community partners in five states (Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia), is involved in increasing cancer education and awareness, conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR), and creating mentorship and training opportunities. The primary objective of this paper is to describe cancer-related disparities in the Appalachian region of the U. S. as an example of the disparities experienced by underserved, predominantly white, rural populations, and to describe ACCN activities designed to intervene regarding these disparities. An ACCN overview/history and the diverse activities of ACCN-participating states are presented in an effort to suggest potential useful strategies for working to reduce health-related disparities in underserved white populations. Strengths that have emerged from the ACCN approach (e. g., innovative collaborations, long-standing established networks) and remaining challenges (e. g., difficulties with continually changing communities, scarce resources) are described. Important recommendations that have emerged from the ACCN are also presented, including the value of allowing communities to lead CBPR efforts. Characteristics of the community-based work of the ACCN provide a framework for reducing health-related disparities in Appalachia and in other underserved white and rural populations. The Oncologist 2011; 16: 1072-1081

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available