4.8 Article

PPARβ/δ promotes HRAS-induced senescence and tumor suppression by potentiating p-ERK and repressing p-AKT signaling

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 33, Issue 46, Pages 5348-5359

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.477

Keywords

peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta; HRAS-induced senescence; mechanisms of senescence; inhibition of tumorigenesis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA124533, CA141029, CA140369, AA018863, CA122109, CA117957]
  2. National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program [ZIABC005561, ZIABC005562, ZIABC005708]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta (PPAR beta/delta) inhibits skin tumorigenesis through mechanisms that may be dependent on HRAS signaling. The present study examined the hypothesis that PPAR beta/delta promotes HRAS-induced senescence resulting in suppression of tumorigenesis. PPAR beta/delta expression increased p-ERK and decreased p-AKT activity. Increased p-ERK activity results from the dampened HRAS-induced negative feedback response mediated in part through transcriptional upregulation of RAS guanyl-releasing protein 1 (RASGRP1) by PPAR beta/delta. Decreased p-AKT activity results from repression of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDPK1) expression. Decreased p-AKT activity in turn promotes cellular senescence through upregulation of p53 and p27 expression. Both over-expression of RASGRP1 and shRNA-mediated knockdown of ILK partially restore cellular senescence in Ppar beta/delta-null cells. Higher PPAR beta/delta expression is also correlated with increased senescence observed in human benign neurofibromas and colon adenoma lesions in vivo. These results demonstrate that PPAR beta/delta promotes senescence to inhibit tumorigenesis and provide new mechanistic insights into HRAS-induced cellular senescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available