4.8 Review

DNA methylation-associated silencing of tumor-suppressor microRNAs in cancer

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 31, Issue 13, Pages 1609-1622

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.354

Keywords

DNA methylation; microRNAs; tumor-suppressor genes

Funding

  1. Lilly Foundation
  2. Dr Josef Steiner Cancer Research Foundation
  3. European Research Council
  4. [SAF2007-00027-65134]
  5. [Consolider CSD2006-49]
  6. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are recognized as being central players in many biological processes and cellular pathways. Their roles in disease have been highlighted first by observation of their aberrant expression profiles in human tumors, and then by in vitro and in vivo functional studies in transformed cells and model organisms. One of the most commonly observed features of miRNAs in malignancies is a defect in their production. Although several causes may be associated with this phenomenon, such as upstream oncogenic/tumor-suppressor defects and alterations in the miRNA-processing machinery, epigenetic inactivation is the prime suspect. The number of miRNAs with putative growth-inhibitory functions undergoing promoter CpG island hypermethylation in human cancer is growing fast and more detailed biological studies are necessary. The recognition of miR-124a and miR-34b/c as bona fide tumor-suppressor miRNAs undergoing DNA methylation-associated silencing in a wide spectrum of human neoplasms is a good starting point to be followed by other candidate miRNAs. Most importantly, even at this early stage, the transcriptional repression of miRNAs by hypermethylation of their corresponding promoter loci seems to be a common feature of all human tumors. This will have translational consequences for the management of the disease. Oncogene (2012) 31, 1609-1622; doi:10.1038/onc.2011.354; published online 22 August 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available