4.8 Article

Amplification of EGFR T790M causes resistance to an irreversible EGFR inhibitor

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 29, Issue 16, Pages 2346-2356

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.526

Keywords

epidermal growth factor receptor; drug resistance; EGFR T790M; amplification; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; non-small cell lung cancer

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1CA114465-04, R01CA135257-01, R01CA137008-01]
  2. National Cancer Institute [P50CA090578]
  3. American Cancer Society [RSG0610201]
  4. Hazel and Samuel Bellin research fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib are effective therapies against mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Treatment is limited by the development of resistance in part explained by the gain of a secondary EGFR mutation, T790M, at the gatekeeper residue. Irreversible EGFR inhibitors, including PF00299804, are effective in vitro and in vivo against EGFR mutant tumors that contain EGFR T790M and are currently under clinical development. In this study, we generate models of resistance to PF00299804, using cell lines with EGFR T790M and show that the PF00299804-resistant models develop focal amplification of EGFR that preferentially involves the T790M-containing allele. These PF00299804-resistant cell lines remain dependent on EGFR for growth as downregulation of EGFR by shRNA compromises their viability. We show that resistance to PF00299804 arises, at least in part, through selection of a pre-existing EGFR T790M-amplified clone both in vitro and using a xenograft model in vivo. Our findings show that EGFR T790M is a common resistance mechanism to both reversible, and when amplified, the irreversible EGFR kinase inhibitors further emphasizing the need to develop more potent therapies against EGFR T790M. These findings can be used to guide studies of patient tumor specimens from ongoing clinical trials of irreversible EGFR kinase inhibitors. Oncogene (2010) 29, 2346-2356; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.526; published online 1 February 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available