4.8 Article

Downregulation of microRNAs directs the EMT and invasive potential of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 29, Issue 29, Pages 4237-4244

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.169

Keywords

ATC; microRNA; TGF beta; EMT; TGFBR1; SMAD2

Funding

  1. DFG
  2. BMBF [FKZ 01ZZ0404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaplastic thyroid carcinomas (ATCs) arise from epithelial thyroid cells by mesenchymal de-/transdifferentiation and rapidly invade the adjacent tissue. Specific microRNA signatures were suggested to distinguish ATCs from normal thyroid tissue and other thyroid carcinomas of follicular origin. Whether distinct microRNA patterns correlate with de-/transdifferentiation and invasion of ATCs remained elusive. We identified two significantly decreased microRNA families that unambiguously distinguish ATCs from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas: miR-200 and miR-30. Expression of these microRNAs in mesenchymal ATC-derived cells reduced their invasive potential and induced mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) by regulating the expression of MET marker proteins. Supporting the role of transforming growth factor (TGF)beta signaling in modulating MET/epithelial- mesenchymal transition (EMT), expression of SMAD2 and TGFBR1, upregulated in most primary ATCs, was controlled by members of the miR-30 and/or miR-200 families in ATC-derived cells. Inhibition of TGF beta receptor 1 (TGFBR1) in these cells induced MET and reduction of prometastatic miR-21, but caused an increase of the miR-200 family. These findings identify altered microRNA signatures as potent markers for ATCs that promote de-/transdifferentiation (EMT) and invasion of these neoplasias. Hence, TGFBR1 inhibition could have a significant potential for the treatment of ATCs and possibly other invasive tumors. Oncogene (2010) 29, 4237-4244; doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.169; published online 24 May 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available