4.8 Article

Transforming growth factor-β decreases the cancer-initiating cell population within diffuse-type gastric carcinoma cells

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 30, Issue 14, Pages 1693-1705

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.546

Keywords

ABCG2; cancer-initiating cell; diffuse type gastric carcinoma; SP cell; TGF-beta

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22700876] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cells in normal tissues and cancer-initiating cells (CICs) are known to be enriched in side population (SP) cells. However, the factors responsible for the regulation of expression of ABCG2, involved in efflux of dyes, in SP cells have not been fully investigated. Here, we characterized the SP cells within diffuse-type gastric carcinoma, and examined the effects of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) on SP cells. Diffuse-type gastric carcinoma cells established from four independent patients universally contained SP cells between 1 and 4% of total cells, which displayed greater tumorigenicity than non-SP cells did. TGF-beta repressed the transcription of ABCG2 through direct binding of Smad2/3 to its promoter/enhancer, and the number of SP cells and the tumor-forming ability of cancer cells were decreased by TGF-beta, although ABCG2 is not directly involved in the tumor-forming ability of SP cells. Cancer cells from metastatic site expressed much higher levels of ABCG2 and included a greater percentage of SP cells than parental cancer cells did. SP cells are thus responsible for the progression of diffuse-type gastric carcinoma, and TGF-beta negatively contributes to maintain the CICs within the cancer. Oncogene (2011) 30, 1693-1705; doi:10.1038/onc.2010.546; published online 6 December 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available