4.8 Article

The normal mammary microenvironment suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of mouse mammary tumor virus-neu-transformed mammary tumor cells

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 679-689

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.439

Keywords

erbB2/HER2; mammary; microenvironment; regeneration; suppression of tumorigenesis

Funding

  1. Center for Cancer Research, NCI
  2. NIH
  3. Institute for Biological Interfaces of Engineering of Clemson University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microenvironment of the mammary gland has been shown to exert a deterministic control over cells from different normal organs during murine mammary gland regeneration in transplantation studies. When mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-neu-induced tumor cells were mixed with normal mammary epithelial cells (MECs) in a dilution series and inoculated into epithelium-free mammary fat pads, they were redirected to noncarcinogenic cell fates by interaction with untransformed MECs during regenerative growth. In the presence of non-transformed MECs (50:1), tumor cells interacted with MECs to generate functional chimeric outgrowths. When injected alone, tumor cells invariably produced tumors. Here, the normal microenvironment redirects MMTV-neu-transformed tumorigenic cells to participate in the regeneration of a normal, functional mammary gland. In addition, the redirected tumor cells show the capacity to differentiate into normal mammary cell types, including luminal, myoepithelial and secretory. The results indicate that signals emanating from a normal mammary microenvironment, comprised of stromal, epithelial and host-mediated signals, combine to suppress the cancer phenotype during glandular regeneration. Clarification of these signals offers improved therapeutic possibilities for the control of mammary cancer growth. Oncogene (2011) 30, 679-689; doi:10.1038/onc.2010.439; published online 4 October 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available