4.8 Article

Methylation profiles of 22 candidate genes in breast cancer using high-throughput MALDI-TOF mass array

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 28, Issue 33, Pages 2969-2978

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.149

Keywords

breast cancer; DNA methylation; MALDI-TOF; mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [320000-119722/1]
  2. Swiss Cancer League
  3. Krebsliga Beider Basel
  4. Dr Hans Altschueler Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alterations of DNA methylation patterns have been suggested as biomarkers for diagnostics and therapy of cancers. Every novel discovery in the epigenetic landscape and every development of an improved approach for accurate analysis of the events may offer new opportunity for the management of patients. Using a novel high-throughput mass spectrometry on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) silico-chips, we determined semiquantitative methylation changes of 22 candidate genes in breast cancer tissues. For the first time we analysed the methylation status of a total of 42 528 CpG dinucleotides on 22 genes in 96 different paraffin-embedded tissues (48 breast cancerous tissues and 48 paired normal tissues). A two-way hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify methylation profiles. In this study, 10 hypermethylated genes (APC, BIN1, BMP6, BRCA1, CST6, ESRb, GSTP1, P16, P21 and TIMP3) were identified to distinguish between cancerous and normal tissues according to the extent of methylation. Individual assessment of the methylation status for each CpG dinucleotide indicated that cytosine hypermethylation in the cancerous tissue samples was mostly located near the consensus sequences of the transcription factor binding sites. These hypermethylated genes may serve as biomarkers for clinical molecular diagnosis and targeted treatments of patients with breast cancer. Oncogene (2009) 28, 2969-2978; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.149; published online 8 June 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available