4.8 Article

Alterations of ubiquitin ligases in human cancer and their association with the natural history of the tumor

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 28, Issue 33, Pages 2959-2968

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.156

Keywords

ubiquitin; ubiquitin E3 ligase; cancer; in situ hybridization; tissue microarrays

Funding

  1. AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro)
  2. AIRC and MIUR
  3. European Community (VI Framework)
  4. Ferrari Foundation
  5. Monzino Foundation
  6. CARIPLO Foundation
  7. G Vollaro Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein ubiquitination is critical for many cellular processes, through its ability to regulate protein degradation and various signaling mechanisms. In the ubiquitin (Ub) system, substrate specificity is achieved through the E3 family of Ub ligases. Because alterations of the ubiquitination machinery have been reported in human cancers, the selective interference with Ub ligases might represent a powerful therapeutic tool. Here, we report the first wide survey of misregulation of Ub ligases in cancer. We analysed 82 Ub ligases in nine types of cancer by in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. We found 27 instances in which an Ub ligase was altered in a given type of tumor, when compared with normal tissues: 21 cases of overexpression and 6 cases of underexpression. We further analysed selected Ub ligases in large cohorts of breast and non-small-cell lung carcinomas. In five, of six, of these extended analyses (HUWE1, CCNB1IP1, SIAH1 and SIAH2 in breast cancer and CCNB1IP1 in lung cancer), we found that the levels of Ub ligases correlated significantly with relevant prognostic factors, and with clinical outcome. Our findings show that the alteration of Ub ligases is a frequent event in cancer and identify candidate targets for molecular therapies. Oncogene (2009) 28, 2959-2968; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.156; published online 22 June 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available