4.8 Article

Copine-III interacts with ErbB2 and promotes tumor cell migration

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 1598-1610

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.456

Keywords

quantitative mass spectrometry; ErbB2; HRG; Copine-III; FRET acceptor photobleaching; cell migration

Funding

  1. TRANSFOG FP6 IP [LSHC-CT-2004-503438]
  2. Novartis Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ErbB2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer correlates with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. To find novel ErbB2-interacting proteins, we used stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture followed by peptide affinity pull-downs and identified specific binders using relative quanti. cation by mass spectrometry. Copine-III, a member of a Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding protein family, was identified as binding to phosphorylated Tyr1248 of ErbB2. In breast cancer cells, Copine-III requires Ca2+ for binding to the plasma membrane, where it interacts with ErbB2 upon receptor stimulation, an interaction that is dependent on receptor activity. Copine-III also binds receptor of activated C kinase 1 and colocalizes with phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase at the leading edge of migrating cells. Importantly, knockdown of Copine-III in T47D breast cancer cells causes a decrease in Src kinase activation and ErbB2-dependent wound healing. Our data suggest that Copine-III is a novel player in the regulation of ErbB2-dependent cancer cell motility. In primary breast tumors, high CPNE3 RNA levels significantly correlate with ERBB2 amplification. Moreover, in an in situ tissue microarray analysis, we detected differential protein expression of Copine-III in normal versus breast, prostate and ovarian tumors, suggesting a more general role for Copine-III in carcinogenesis. Oncogene (2010) 29, 1598-1610; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.456; published online 14 December 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available