4.8 Article

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts null for the Kruppel-like factor 4 gene are genetically unstable

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1197-1205

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.465

Keywords

aneuploidy; centrosome amplification; cell cycle; chromosome aberrations; gamma-H2AX; KLF4

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK52230, DK64399, CA84197]
  2. NIH National Research Service Award [CA130308]
  3. Emory Biochemistry, Cell and Developmental Biology (BCDB) training grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is a zinc-finger transcription factor with tumor suppressive activity in colorectal cancer. Here, we investigated whether KLF4 is involved in maintaining genetic stability in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) isolated from mice wild type (+/+), heterozygous (+/-), or homozygous (-/-) for the Klf4 alleles. Compared to Klf4(+/+) and Klf4(+/-) MEFs, Klf4(-/-) MEFs had both a higher level of apoptosis and rate of proliferation. Quantification of chromosome numbers showed that Klf4(-/-) MEFs were aneuploid. A higher number of Klf4(-/-) MEFs exhibited gamma-H2AX foci and had higher amounts of gamma-H2AX compared to controls. Cytogenetic analysis demonstrated the presence of numerous chromosome aberrations including dicentric chromosomes, chromatid breaks, and double minute chromosomes in Klf4(-/-) cells but in few, if any, Klf4(+/+) or Klf4(+/-) MEFs. Approximately 25% of Klf4(-/-) MEFs exhibited centrosome amplification in contrast to the less than 5% of Klf4(+/+) or Klf4(+/-) MEFs. Finally, only Klf4(-/-) MEFs were capable of anchorage-independent growth. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that MEFs null for the Klf4 alleles are genetically unstable, as evidenced by the presence of aneuploidy, chromosome aberration and centrosome amplification. The results support a crucial role for KLF4 in maintaining genetic stability and as a tumor suppressor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available