4.8 Article

The Ste20-like kinase SLK is required for ErbB2-driven breast cancer cell motility

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 28, Issue 31, Pages 2839-2848

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.146

Keywords

cell migration; focal adhesion; Ste20-like kinase; ErbB2; HER2

Funding

  1. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation
  2. Canadian Institute for Health Research
  3. Premier's Research for Excellence Award
  4. OGSST
  5. NSERC
  6. Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation Fellowship
  7. National Cancer Institute of Canada
  8. CIHR scholar award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Ste20-like kinase, SLK, is involved in the control of cell motility through its effects on actin reorganization and focal adhesion turnover. Here we investigated the role of SLK in chemotaxis downstream of the tyrosine kinase receptor, HER2/ErbB2/Neu, which is frequently over-expressed in human breast cancers. Our results show that SLK is required for the efficient cell migration of human and mouse mammary epithelial cell lines in the presence of the Neu activator, heregulin, as a chemoattractant. SLK activity is stimulated by heregulin treatment or by overexpression of activated Neu. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 1201 or tyrosines 1226/7 on Neu is a key event for SLK activation and cell migration, and cancer cell invasion mediated by these tyrosines is inhibited by kinase-inactive SLK. Signaling pathway inhibitors show that Neu-mediated SLK activation is dependent on MEK, PI3K, PLC gamma and Shc signaling. Furthermore, heregulin-stimulated SLK activity requires signals from the focal adhesion proteins, FAK and src. Finally, phospho-FAK analysis shows that SLK is required for Neu-dependent focal adhesion turnover. Together, these studies de. ne an interaction between Neu and SLK signaling in the regulation of cancer cell motility. Oncogene (2009) 28, 2839-2848; doi:10.1038/onc.2009.146; published online 15 June 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available